Should Voting be Mandatory? Democratic Decision Making from the Economic Viewpoint

نویسندگان

  • Olga Kosheleva
  • Vladik Kreinovich
  • Baokun Li
چکیده

Many decisions are made by voting. At first glance, the more people participate in the voting process, the more democratic – and hence, better – the decision. In this spirit, to encourage everyone’s participation, several countries make voting mandatory. But does mandatory voting really make decisions better for the society? In this paper, we show that from the viewpoint of decision making theory, it is better to allow undecided voters not to participate in the voting process. We also show that the voting process would be even better – for the society as a whole – if we allow partial votes. This provides a solid justification for a semi-heuristic “fuzzy voting” scheme advocated by Bart Kosko. Need for democratic decision making. Often, a social entity faces a problem, and there are several alternative ways to solve this problem. For example, to build a new baseball stadium, the city can either use the existing funds or issue a bond – and hope that the future profits from this stadium will pay off this bond. In many such cases, the decision is made by voting: the choice is placed on a ballot, and the solution is decided by a majority vote. Voting is beneficial not only in the social life: there is a body of research showing that students perform better in a democratic classroom, where they are actively involved in day-by-day pedagogical decisions; see, e.g., [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. Which form of democratic decision making is the best? Does the democratic process always leads to a solution which is the best for the population? No doubt, democracy is better than tyranny, and a decision made with people’s participation is better than a decision made by the rulers without the people’s input, but democracy can mean many different things, and it is not a priori clear which form of democratic decision making is the best. For example, some countries (like Australia) force its citizens to vote, imposing fines and other penalties for not voting, while in the US, voting is voluntary.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Enabling Crowd Participation in Governmental Decision-making

Democratic governments constantly need to make sense of their citizens’ needs to make appropriate decisions that reflect the overall wishes and needs of the population. However, except for mandatory voting scenarios, a low rate of citizen participation in government decisions through democratic processes is an aspect that defies democracy itself. Brazil’s participatory budget policy emphasizes ...

متن کامل

A novel approach in robust group decision making for supply strategic planning

Long-term planning is a challenging process for dealing with problems in big industries. Quick and flexible process of responding to the existing variable requirements are considered in such problems. Some of important strategic decisions which should be made in this field are, namely the way that manufacturing facilities should be applied as well as assignment and design the system of delivery...

متن کامل

The No-Destination Ship of Priority-Setting in Healthcare: A Call for More Democracy

In dealing with scarcity of resources within healthcare systems, decision-makers inevitably have to make choices about which services to fund. Setting priorities represents a challenging task that requires systematic, explicit and transparent methodologies with focus on economic efficiency. In addition, the engagement of the general public in the process of decision-making has been regarded as ...

متن کامل

The Perspectives of Democratic Decision-Making in the Information Society

In order to structure the debate on the democratic potentials of digital information technology Hubertus Buchstein in 1996 created three ideal types, net optimism, net pessimism and net neutrality. In this study the viability of these positions is put under scrutiny from a current viewpoint. As a result, it should be noted that all positions, however, contain both elements that are still viable...

متن کامل

The stability of international coalitions in United Nations voting from 1946 to 1973

The stability of outcomes under democratic decision-making is a significant issue in public choice. Several factors might make U.N. voting blocs less stable than blocs in national legislatures. Nevertheless, the data suggest that from 1946 to 1973 United Nations voting blocs were relatively stable. Nations that leave their blocs tend to vote with nearby blocs rather than making large ideologica...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012